<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Criticism As Inspiration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://criticismas.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>"The question is not what you look at, but what you see." -Thoreau</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Fair Trade&#8230; For Our Conscience Or Their Benefit? by Tim Kowal</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/fair-trade-for-our-conscience-or-their-benefit/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kowal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1713#comment-774</guid>
		<description>The problem with Fair Trade is that it is not *free* trade.  It is not the repugnant kind of infringement that, say, slavery is.  But it is a difference in degree, not a difference in kind.  Ultimately, the recipients of Fair Trade subsidies will come to resemble Tocqueville&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://notesfrombabel.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-man-on-the-right-bank-and-the-man-on-the-left-bank/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Man on the Left Bank.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  It distorts the causal relationship between a man&#039;s work and the payment he receives for it.  He loses his incentive to use his mind and talent to make his work more productive and valuable.  And thus, when the distortion is eventually corrected, he is left behind his fellow workers who, having been truly free all the while, have far surpassed him in increasing their productive value.  He is thus left servile to the state, a progressivist&#039;s anecdote in support of more welfare programs -- which will in turn do the same damage to another segment of the society.  

Free trade is hard work.  There is no escaping the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Red Queen problem&lt;/a&gt; there: &quot;Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!&quot;  It is no remedy to subsidize the slow runners, or to encourage them to train less vigorously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Fair Trade is that it is not *free* trade.  It is not the repugnant kind of infringement that, say, slavery is.  But it is a difference in degree, not a difference in kind.  Ultimately, the recipients of Fair Trade subsidies will come to resemble Tocqueville&#8217;s <a href="http://notesfrombabel.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-man-on-the-right-bank-and-the-man-on-the-left-bank/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Man on the Left Bank.&#8221;</a>  It distorts the causal relationship between a man&#8217;s work and the payment he receives for it.  He loses his incentive to use his mind and talent to make his work more productive and valuable.  And thus, when the distortion is eventually corrected, he is left behind his fellow workers who, having been truly free all the while, have far surpassed him in increasing their productive value.  He is thus left servile to the state, a progressivist&#8217;s anecdote in support of more welfare programs &#8212; which will in turn do the same damage to another segment of the society.  </p>
<p>Free trade is hard work.  There is no escaping the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race" rel="nofollow">Red Queen problem</a> there: &#8220;Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!&#8221;  It is no remedy to subsidize the slow runners, or to encourage them to train less vigorously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Strikes by Ted</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/three-strikes/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1681#comment-772</guid>
		<description>All I know is I ain&#039;t going back to prison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know is I ain&#8217;t going back to prison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by Elijah</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I disagree with a lot of Richardson&#039;s politics from what I&#039;ve read (see: &lt;a href=&quot;http://johnhrichardson.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Last Abortion Doctor&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I disagree with a lot of Richardson&#8217;s politics from what I&#8217;ve read (see: <a href="http://johnhrichardson.com/" rel="nofollow">The Last Abortion Doctor</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by Mark</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-770</guid>
		<description>You may be right Elijah, but I wasn&#039;t really focused on the whole article or being against liberal reform.  As I said, as soon as I got to that initial statement I basically stopped reading so probably missed that last half.

My comment was aimed at Richardson&#039;s writing and way of thinking about abortion, not Obama particularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right Elijah, but I wasn&#8217;t really focused on the whole article or being against liberal reform.  As I said, as soon as I got to that initial statement I basically stopped reading so probably missed that last half.</p>
<p>My comment was aimed at Richardson&#8217;s writing and way of thinking about abortion, not Obama particularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by Elijah</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Your stance is exactly what Richardson is talking about - you&#039;re surprisingly against liberal reform.  Did you continue reading past the timeline?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Noticing a pattern yet? The first half of Obama&#039;s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.

Liberals are upset because Obama didn&#039;t shut down Guantánamo or stop the wiretapping program or end all wars or support gay marriage and kill Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell. Conservatives are pissed off because they hate health-care reform, family planning, ending any war at all, organic gardening at the White House, and government in general.

What&#039;s worse, both sides are so angry and righteous that they can&#039;t even begin to give credit where it is due. When was the last time you heard a conservative cheer about that $288 billion tax cut? Or credit Obama for the centrism it took to appoint McChrystal, Panetta, and Gates? And how many liberals choose to be understanding about the practical difficulties of shutting down Guantánamo, achieving equal rights for gays, or tapping Al Qaeda&#039;s phones?

And where, on either side, can you find a scrap of humility about the staggeringly complex challenge of Afghanistan and Pakistan? Or a scrap of gratitude at having escaped global financial doom?

So the question, a year since we elected him, isn&#039;t how much Obama has accomplished. The question is why we&#039;ve turned so small and mean that we only see half of it — the half we happen to agree with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Also, Richardson is a very liberal guy, so I didn&#039;t expect his assessment to be fair, but it&#039;s still a side to deal with in the face of &quot;OBAMA HASN&#039;T DONE A THING.&quot;


Grumbles,
WOOT! WOOT! PALIN 2012!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Your stance is exactly what Richardson is talking about &#8211; you&#8217;re surprisingly against liberal reform.  Did you continue reading past the timeline?</p>
<blockquote><p>Noticing a pattern yet? The first half of Obama&#8217;s accomplishments above is mostly liberal stuff. The bottom half is all pretty dang conservative. Which brings us to The Problem With America Today: Blame it on the Internet, on partisan politics, on the economic crash, on the legacy of war or Fox News or Michael Moore, but our vital center is getting stiff — and it is starting to stink.</p>
<p>Liberals are upset because Obama didn&#8217;t shut down Guantánamo or stop the wiretapping program or end all wars or support gay marriage and kill Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell. Conservatives are pissed off because they hate health-care reform, family planning, ending any war at all, organic gardening at the White House, and government in general.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s worse, both sides are so angry and righteous that they can&#8217;t even begin to give credit where it is due. When was the last time you heard a conservative cheer about that $288 billion tax cut? Or credit Obama for the centrism it took to appoint McChrystal, Panetta, and Gates? And how many liberals choose to be understanding about the practical difficulties of shutting down Guantánamo, achieving equal rights for gays, or tapping Al Qaeda&#8217;s phones?</p>
<p>And where, on either side, can you find a scrap of humility about the staggeringly complex challenge of Afghanistan and Pakistan? Or a scrap of gratitude at having escaped global financial doom?</p>
<p>So the question, a year since we elected him, isn&#8217;t how much Obama has accomplished. The question is why we&#8217;ve turned so small and mean that we only see half of it — the half we happen to agree with.</p></blockquote>
<p>Also, Richardson is a very liberal guy, so I didn&#8217;t expect his assessment to be fair, but it&#8217;s still a side to deal with in the face of &#8220;OBAMA HASN&#8217;T DONE A THING.&#8221;</p>
<p>Grumbles,<br />
WOOT! WOOT! PALIN 2012!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by Sgt. Grumbles</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt. Grumbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-768</guid>
		<description>You are pardoned Mark...

Just like all those terrorist Uighurs that Obama cut loose from Gitmo. 

PALIN 2012!!!  You&#039;d see some serious ROGUE ACTION happening in those first 100 days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are pardoned Mark&#8230;</p>
<p>Just like all those terrorist Uighurs that Obama cut loose from Gitmo. </p>
<p>PALIN 2012!!!  You&#8217;d see some serious ROGUE ACTION happening in those first 100 days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by Mark</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Pardon me if I have some skepticism about Richardson&#039;s list of Obama&#039;s accomplishments.  I nearly stopped reading after only the third one:

&quot;A day later, Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99831044&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reversed&lt;/a&gt; George W. Bush&#039;s funding cutoff to overseas family planning organizations — saving millions of lives with the stroke of a pen.&quot;

A very interesting idea...SAVING &#039;millions&#039; of lives by funding abortions????  Add to that illogical statement with the quote from the very source he links to:
 
&quot;For eight years under Bush, the global gag rule undermined the ability of providers everywhere to care for women according to best medical practice, and contributed to the deaths and injuries of an untold number of women who sought unsafe abortions when their community-based clinics and hospitals couldn&#039;t offer services, information or referrals,&quot; said Pablo Rodriguez, board chairman of the Association of Reproductive Health Care Professionals.

How does &quot;untold lives&quot;, an anecdotal statistic if I&#039;ve ever heard of one, translate into millions?  Perhaps I&#039;m missing something, but I don&#039;t think so.  Half of the things Richardson listed as accomplishments are direct results of raising spending to &quot;insane&quot; levels... hardly something to brag about.  I&#039;m not saying Obama hasn&#039;t done anything, nor that he won&#039;t at all, but this article rings of a desperate attempt to make lemonade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me if I have some skepticism about Richardson&#8217;s list of Obama&#8217;s accomplishments.  I nearly stopped reading after only the third one:</p>
<p>&#8220;A day later, Obama <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99831044" rel="nofollow">reversed</a> George W. Bush&#8217;s funding cutoff to overseas family planning organizations — saving millions of lives with the stroke of a pen.&#8221;</p>
<p>A very interesting idea&#8230;SAVING &#8216;millions&#8217; of lives by funding abortions????  Add to that illogical statement with the quote from the very source he links to:</p>
<p>&#8220;For eight years under Bush, the global gag rule undermined the ability of providers everywhere to care for women according to best medical practice, and contributed to the deaths and injuries of an untold number of women who sought unsafe abortions when their community-based clinics and hospitals couldn&#8217;t offer services, information or referrals,&#8221; said Pablo Rodriguez, board chairman of the Association of Reproductive Health Care Professionals.</p>
<p>How does &#8220;untold lives&#8221;, an anecdotal statistic if I&#8217;ve ever heard of one, translate into millions?  Perhaps I&#8217;m missing something, but I don&#8217;t think so.  Half of the things Richardson listed as accomplishments are direct results of raising spending to &#8220;insane&#8221; levels&#8230; hardly something to brag about.  I&#8217;m not saying Obama hasn&#8217;t done anything, nor that he won&#8217;t at all, but this article rings of a desperate attempt to make lemonade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A year after the election&#8230; by maplesyrup10</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/a-year-after-the-election/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>maplesyrup10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1708#comment-766</guid>
		<description>interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Albums of 2009 (thus far) by Grizzly Bear in Glasgow &#171; Criticism As Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/best-albums-of-2009-thus-far/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly Bear in Glasgow &#171; Criticism As Inspiration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1455#comment-765</guid>
		<description>[...] of writing about seeing Grizzly Bear, a Brooklyn-based band (whose album Veckatimest is currently my number one pick this year), in America I will briefly comment about their show that I attended last night in Glasgow, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of writing about seeing Grizzly Bear, a Brooklyn-based band (whose album Veckatimest is currently my number one pick this year), in America I will briefly comment about their show that I attended last night in Glasgow, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daniel Smith by Sgt. Grumbles</title>
		<link>http://criticismas.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/daniel-smith/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt. Grumbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criticismas.wordpress.com/?p=1674#comment-763</guid>
		<description>Elijah, my dear brother and comrade, how I love you!  I feel similarly about you, as you well know.

As far as Brother Danielson...he is remarkable.  I heard once Danielson played in the Biola caf--that would have been a sight to see.  

Someday, some kid is going to say, I saw Elijah Wade play outside of Horton Hall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elijah, my dear brother and comrade, how I love you!  I feel similarly about you, as you well know.</p>
<p>As far as Brother Danielson&#8230;he is remarkable.  I heard once Danielson played in the Biola caf&#8211;that would have been a sight to see.  </p>
<p>Someday, some kid is going to say, I saw Elijah Wade play outside of Horton Hall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
